A few years ago I studied this idea and read a few writings on it which raised many serious questions. Many serious questions for Christians who have any regard to the question of redemption and God’s ultimate plan. The very foundation of Universal Redemption flies directly in the face of mainstream Christianity, which has taught and still teaches that most of mankind is doomed, while only a few elect will be saved. I am not necessarily saying that the former belief is false, because I most certainly believe in an upcoming divine punishment, and it is not my decision to say what constitutes God’s love. If many will be left out, then so be it. The question is: Will an infinite and all-loving God decide to leave out millions of people?
Christ died for all of mankind and his death was the payment for the sins of the entire world. If there is an elect that God chose before the foundation of the world, then what purpose does Christ’s death for all MEN Serve? How do we reconcile Christ’s death for ALL MEN with God’s predestined plan for the ‘elect.’ I suppose one could easily answer this question by saying: The Elect do not know they are elect, and since God has given us responsibility as men to choose, then God still had to send Christ to die for all men – to show his mercy for ALL MEN. This answer would supposedly nullify the idea that Christ died for all men to SAVE ALL MEN. Yet, God makes it plain that it his desire and will for all of mankind to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. (timothy 2:4) One will say: “Just because God desires something, doesn’t mean he will carry out his will in a way to fulfill that stated wish.” This may be so, but it doesn’t abolish God’s very known intention, which is for all MEN to come to the KNOWLEDGE of the truth. To say that God wishes all men to come the knowledge of the truth, yet simultaneously say God has pre-chosen certain members of mankind, makes no sense to me. God states that it his DESIRE for all of mankind to be saved. Why would God have this longing desire if he chose the church before the foundation of the world? An all-knowing God has a desire for something that he sort out beforehand? This doesn’t sound like an all-knowing and infinitely wise God, but it sounds like a God who is regretful of his election. Perhaps there is an election and I simply do not understand God’s holy nature, but I choose to look at the statements God has revealed to us and reflect on them to the best of my ability.
Perhaps there is a distinct election for some and not for others, or perhaps there is no election, just 100% free will, but it can not all be up to mankind, otherwise the sovereignty of God disappears, or does it? Perhaps God’s sovereignty can still be executed if he let’s man have complete choice and freedom. The idea of election vs. Free Will is a whole other argument, but it seems correlative in respect to the idea of limited punishment vs. eternal punishment. Regardless, we know that salvation is not earned by works alone, or faith alone, but by the grace of God. The bible clearly insinuates that man is saved by Grace, with works, and faith, but not one solely. The question now becomes: Can man do a good work after Death? Is this life the only life to seek redemption? Is it possible that God can use his wrath and punishment(something I wish to have a no part in) to redeem all of mankind? Is Punishment eternal? Or is it Agelasting? And if it is only age-lasting, then what does God do when he is through with punishment? Does he let man fade into the darkness, or does he bring them to his light? God will never force his will on a man, but God’s love is strong enough to turn any man away from his ways. Surely, God’s love is more powerful then we can imagine, so why can’t God redeem all of mankind?
I am not saying God will save all men, but the idea is thought provoking, and I believe that any reasonable person should at least consider the subject. I am not going to get into scripture in this note, unless someone wishes to engage in it, but I am merely discussing the subject in generalities and using the God-given reason I was born with.
I was thinking about all religions of the world, and how none of them offer Universal Redemption as a model to their theology. Even if Universal Redemption turns out to be false, it is surely amazing that it is one of the most Unique belief systems concerning the will/nature of God and his ultimate purposes. Do Muslims or Jewish religions offer up this precept? Not that I have ever heard of. All of mainstream religion offers some means toward heaven, but also clearly states many will be doomed for ETERNITY in HELL FIRE. All mainstream religions agree on this, and surely, it could be true. But in my view – the bible has many universalist passages which seem to hint enough for this subject to have arisen. If the bible was so clear on the subject of redemption, then why have men throughout the ages discussed it in great length over and over and over? Surely there is a good reason for this. Some may say it is heresy, or that Men discuss it because it suits their desires and their imagination, but all of these things are faculties which God has given us – an imagination, thoughts, and reason, and as free creatures, we are allowed to ponder the idea… are we not? And if we are allowed to ponder the idea and delve into scripture, why should anyone be afraid this? I am not saying Universal Redemption is true, but I am defending the rights of man to bring this issue up without being labeled as a heresy. People in general are quick in rushing judgment, and many men who dislike the idea of Universal Redemption would rather cry lunacy and herectic without refuting the argument with their own reason, and that is the type of dialogue I choose to ignore. I believe any serious Christian will pray for understanding and listen to all views of scripture, even if it goes against the grain. It is not a sin to listen to people, and it might be more of a sin to denounce all other ideas as lunacy simply because you can not understand them or reason them out.
It takes God’s grace for us to do the right thing, and if this is the case, is it possible that God must discipline many of his creatures to heal them of their moral depravity and eventually let them enter the kingdom of God? Some will say: “NO, Christ’s death has made us righteous! there is no other way…” which is very true, but just because we will be rewarded and declared righteous in God’s eyes through Christ, doesn’t mean God is finished with all of his business, does it? Christ’s payment was for all of mankind, and even though some do not accept Christ as their Savior in this life, does not mean God can not bring them to Christ at a later time, nor does man’s rejection of Christ nullify Christ’s death for them. In the book of revelation, it says there will be “everlasting,” punishment. In greek “everlasting,” is translated as AGElasting, which is far different. In my studies of greek, I do not see the word ETERNAL being applied to God’s punishment, but only to God’s kingdom. The greek usage of the word AGE(AION) is a whole other discussion for a whole other time, but shed’s light on the idea of punishment. Is it limited or forever? The english version of the bible does not do God justice if you ask me. The bible was not written in english, so why should one man trust a translation that is full of translational errors?
In closing, I will say that I am undecided wholeheartedly, but I favor the idea that God will have to annihilate or put some through eternal punishment. Simply saying this makes me cringe, but I believe part of God’s nature is his justice and this requires punishment, which may indeed be eternal. But just because I favor this, does not mean I will forever dismiss the idea of Universal Salvation, because I believe it could be true and I will continue to research the subject at great length, as well as free will, election, determinism, and much more intriguing spiritual subjects.